When it comes to investing in a range finder, some of the things to consider would be its functions, reliability and quality. Besides, getting hold of the range finder that suits you best will make a whole lot of difference in your game. We put two of the best range finders on the market today, to see which one performs the best, the Nikon Coolshot 40i vs Bushnell V3 Slope.
The Nikon and Bushnell range finders are two of the top-line golf range finders, which come with slope adjusted distances. The Nikon, however, beats the Bushnell in the magnification aspect, providing 6x magnification, where the latter provides 5x. The Bushnell V3 and the Nikon 40i are both rainproof.
In distance accuracy, the Nikon range finder provides an excellent 0.5 yard, while the Bushnell provides 1 yard. However, the latter outweighs the former in range performances. The Bushnell can go up to a 1000 yards, while the Nikon goes only up to 650 yards.
The Bushnell V3 is relatively better in both optics and display. With this unit, you will have a comfortable fit and smooth performance. In addition, the range finder is designed to provide users with a JOLT or vibrational feedback to inform them that it has locked its target, which you don’t get with the Nikon 40i. You can, however, turn off the JOLT feature if you don’t like it. The Bushnell V3 also happens to be one of the reasonably priced range finder, considering that it comes with slope compensated distance.
Nikon Coolshot 40i Vs Bushnell V3 Slope
Overall, from the consideration of several important aspects of the Nikon Coolshot 40i vs Bushnell V3 Slope, the latter one succeeds, as it certainly is better that the Nikon in important aspects like range performance, optics, display as well as with the vibrational feedback feature. Although they both come in almost similar prices, investing in the Bushnell V3 would definitely be more worth it.